Talk:Argument from analogy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Argument from analogy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Dis-analogy

--this article is very wrong [or at least misleading]-- dis-analogy is actually what is explained here to be unintended consequences. see 3.1 here http://www.arts.uwaterloo.ca/~raha/CogSci600_web/Readings/Shelley2.pdf

etc. just read the article above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.222.160.175 (talk) 23:32, 2013 July 3 (UTC)

Merged False analogy

This is the talk page and this was the article just before the merge, i.e., just a copy of this one with a paragraph and a couple of unsourced examples added. - Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]