Talk:Argonite

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Brands

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles

Expand

I just think that there should be a little more on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.179.136.106 (talk • contribs)

Gemstone

I make designer jewelry and I purchased a peach, rather dense stone called 'Argonite' It is either mislabeled or is also a semi-precious gemstone - anybody know? snoocks2@charter.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.236.244.55 (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argonite as a mineral is a mistake for aragonite. Note that this page at the Mineral Information Institute consists of nothing more than this image which Wikipedia claims to be aragonite. - RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

I saw a fascinating telly program recently in which Michael Portillo looked at alternative methods of carrying out death sentences. His conclusion was "make the victim breathe nitrogen"! An argon/nitrogen mixture was also mentioned.

This article needs to explain the advantages of an Ar/N mixture over straight N for extinguishing fires - and for that matter extinguishing life. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why Ar+N instead of pure N was also what I wondered when reading the article. I am looking for something to fill this gap. Mtpaley (talk) 19:08, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copypaste

Parts of this article are copied from here http://www.chemetron.com/utcfs/Templates/Pages/Template-53/0,8062,pageId%3D62637%26siteId%3D5230,00.html but given that this article is also marked as 'written like a advertisement' I don't see chemetron (the only external link) complaining. What to do? It is copied but having the copied section is more informative than deleting it and it seems to be the greater good. What is the WP policy here? Mtpaley (talk) 19:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not just written like a advert, this is a advert as can be seen from the above link. A related product Inergen has the same issues. IMHO a example of how to so this correctly is FM-200 which talks about the chemical and its effects and just notes trademarks for it. Mtpaley (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]