Talk:Arctoidea
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The article contradicts itself at the moment
[edit]Currently, the introduction states that the Amphicyonidae belong to the Arctoidea. According to the family tree, they don't. What's the current state of knowledge? --KnightMove (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- I could be wrong here, but it looks to me that the introduction states that the now extinct Hemicyonidae belong to Arctoidea, but Amphicyonidae don't. So... dog-bears do but bear-dogs don't... obviously... WormTT
- I'm very sorry, I must have had blinders on. --KnightMove (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. Like I say, I was surprised that dog-bears aren't the same as bear-dogs. But then I guess tions and ligers aren't the same... WormTT 15:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry, I must have had blinders on. --KnightMove (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Mustelida?
[edit]The article asserts that "Mustelida" is the musteloid/pinniped clade. No usage of that term is to be found in the source given, and I can find no other. Anyone have such a source, or is this an error? 109.255.211.6 (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)