Talk:Architectural structure

Name for article

Architectural structure is not a good name for this article. I think it should be Structure (architecture). I say this because of the disambiguation editing guideline. The section of this guideline on naming conventions (WP:NCDAB) says that the disambiguating word is added as a noun in parentheses, and only rarely as an adjective in front of the word. Any comments before I make a move? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 23:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the most ridiculous definition of a structure I ever encountered on Wikipedia. Made up and therefore useless. Yey for removing it. 76.197.181.206 (talk) 05:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

This article contained no useful information, only a point of view about the subject which is at least reasonably covered by Architectural engineering. A merge might have bren in order if there was anything to salvage but I can't see anything of value. Discuss here please if you don't agree. ProfDEH (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

non sequitur

'Architectural structure' refers to a brick-and-mortar location, so why does this disambiguation page link to a profession?

Longpinkytoes (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]