Talk:Architectural photographers

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rename to "architectural photography"?

An architectural photographer is a practitioner of architectural photography, which has no article here and which is not explained within this article, which looked to me like a "coatrack" for spam about two recent photographers. I've removed the spam; how about renaming this to, and developing it as, "architectural photography"? -- Hoary (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. However, an administrator will have to do it. R69S (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree as well, so it would be time to do it. — --Elekhh (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As it stands I couldn't support such a move. The existing article is about photographers rather than photography. Suggest that material on architectural photography needs to be added immediately. It would, for example, be entirely appropriate to refactor the lead, and add sections on the theory of architectural photography and such. Then a move would be justified. Andrewa (talk) 11:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The proposed title doesn't reflect the current article's contents. Change the article first, then move. — AjaxSmack 05:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn move request. OK I see it does not work from bureaucratic point of view. Will replace the other redirect with content, and merge this one there. That way it will not involve the need for admin tools either. --Elekhh (talk) 09:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Normally, I would say don't do the cut and paste since architectural photographers has a longer history but, since there's not much content at the current article and architectural photography as a bit of history itself, it should work OK in this case. — AjaxSmack 10:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural photography as a separate article and naming of this article

I have added an Architectural photography article, as there seems to be some consensus that the topic is not the same as Architectural photographers. It would be great to get some help fleshing the article out by anyone knowledgeable about the subject, or with good research source material.

I would like to propose that the name of this article, Architectural photographers be renamed to Architectural photographer. Pluralizing occupations seems to be inconsistent with other articles about occupations (for example, [Doctor], [Plumber], [Engineer] and [Teacher]). Does anyone have objections to moving this article to Architectural photographer? MrX 14:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Architectural photographers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110110061455/http://asmp.org/articles/architecture-specialty-group.html to http://asmp.org/articles/architecture-specialty-group.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]