Talk:Archaeoastronomy and Vedic chronology

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

split

split from Indian astronomy so that in depth discussion of fringe claims can be held on-topic per WP:FRINGE, and to justify categorization in Category:Archaeoastronomy. --dab (𒁳) 09:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment moved from article

[1] reproduced below. Doldrums (talk) 08:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is easy to say they are dismissed in Mainstream Indology. But then one has to discuss why they are dismissed. If no reasons are given for such dismissal, it amounts to a hill of beans

This is clearly a misleading statement. It is usually very unambiguuous from the context, whether the author of the particular astronomical text is talking about astronomy , where he is mostly concerned about the position of the planet in the solar system or whether he is talking about astrology where he is primarily interested in predicting whether the consequences of the planetary positions are good or bad for the individual in question. While it is true that the word Jyotisa is used for both, it is impossible to mistake one(astronomy) from the other (astrology). For example in Ayabhata's work the Aryabhatiyum there is very little about astrology. Almost the entire book is about astronomical calculations. The precision of Arybhatas calculations are astonishing and it wasnt until the modern era that we have been able to match his precison.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaushal42 (talk • contribs)

The precision of Arybhatas calculations are astonishing and it wasnt until the modern era that we have been able to match his precison

not true, if you ever cared to look up the works of Ptolemy, Eratosthenes etc. ChandlerMinh (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archaeoastronomy and Vedic chronology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archaeoastronomy and Vedic chronology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930024500/http://www.positiveatheism.org/india/s1990c12.htm to http://www.positiveatheism.org/india/s1990c12.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead citation

Add citation for Aryabhata calculating the date of Kurukshetra War. ChandlerMinh (talk) 08:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]