Talk:Arabinogalactan protein

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was adapted from Yingxuan Ma; Kim Johnson (15 January 2021). "Arabinogalactan-proteins" (PDF). WikiJournal of Science. 4 (1): 2. doi:10.15347/WJS/2021.002. ISSN 2470-6345. Wikidata Q99557488.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) after peer review (reviewer reports) under a CC BY 4.0 license (2021).

Start

It's a basic page on a biological topic that doesn't seem to be covered yet, so I thought I'd start it, but I don't know enough about it to write a full article about it, so I'm going to put my stub out there and see if it flies. Terri G (talk) 18:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arabinogalactan proteins

Edits were made during the Writing in life sciences pages132.235.52.86 (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the material organized and focused? Materials are organized in individual components but information in those components are insufficient Is the presentation understandable? Yes, there were no ambiquity in fact presentation Does the article cover the topic comprehensively, partially, or is it an overview? The article covered the topics but information in those sub-topics is insufficient What is the quality of the evidence? The quality of the evidence is the mentioning of the AGP structure and the biological roles each of those structures play in-vivo. Also, they play in-vivo was documented. However, more recent facts has to be included to strengthen the write up. Does the article have references or is it just someone’s knowledge? Were assumptions made? References were available and no assumptions were made How might the content be improved? By researching more into each sub-sections and using up to date information Does the article have an introduction? No Is the introduction understandable and does it summarize the article’s key points? No introduction available to critically evaluate. Are there several headings and subheadings? Yes, 3 subsections Is there anything missing? Introduction section Are there images and diagrams at appropriate places and appendices and footnotes at the end? No diagram or image is present and appendices and footnotes are not available Is the coverage neutral (unbiased)? Yes, unbiased Are facts emphazied? Important facts were emphasized with reference to the AGP structure and biological roles in plants Are the references reliable sources? Why or why not There are references but some of the references were out-dated. For example, the AGP structure was based on a paper published in 1984 and more recent information are available to strenghten the work. That said, all the references were from primary literatures.132.235.76.2 (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date formats

Dates need to be converted to Wiki format. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was quick! Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]