Talk:Aquilegia moorcroftiana
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aquilegia moorcroftiana article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]
( )
- ... that Aquilegia moorcroftiana is named after a mountaineer and is found at the highest elevation of any species of columbine?
- Source: Nold, Robert (2003). Columbines: Aquilegia, Paraquilegia, and Semiaquilegia. Portland, OR: Timber Press. ISBN 0881925888.
- Reviewed: 1.) Template:Did you know nominations/Man of Smoke, 2.) Template:Did you know nominations/Skin of My Teeth
- Comment:
Created by Pbritti (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 57 past nominations.
Pbritti (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- I would suggest changing the sentence in the article "named for William Moorcroft" to "named after William Moorcroft" to make the wording clearer, and likewise for the hook.
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
This is my first review so I would like a second opinion. jolielover♥talk 16:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jolielover: Thanks for the review—how fun that this was your first. Welcome to the club! I think that "named for" is an Americanism and "named after" is the preference in British English; as the most relevant Engvars in this case would be British, Pakistani, or Indian English, I've adopted the suggested phrasing. By my estimation, I think your review is decent, but let me know if you want any clarifications! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: Thanks for the feedback, I actually had no clue it was a variation in English so sorry about that! jolielover♥talk 03:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jolielover: Neither did I. Thanks for the review; consider keeping this on your watchlist in case someone has some insights for you to keep in mind in future reviews! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: Thanks for the feedback, I actually had no clue it was a variation in English so sorry about that! jolielover♥talk 03:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jolielover: Thanks for the review—how fun that this was your first. Welcome to the club! I think that "named for" is an Americanism and "named after" is the preference in British English; as the most relevant Engvars in this case would be British, Pakistani, or Indian English, I've adopted the suggested phrasing. By my estimation, I think your review is decent, but let me know if you want any clarifications! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)