Talk:Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu

Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 24, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Andhra Pradesh / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in August 2016.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 26 June 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 20:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this article tomorrow. MWright96 (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Plot

"he sends goons to attack him." - Goons is informal
How about a "mobster"?
- Yes I think that is more appropriate. MWright96 (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Usha, is strained and attempts to marry her off are thwarted." - Who made the attempts for marriage?
Ramalingam made the attempts and Govindam thwarted them. I have mentioned the same as per your suggestion.
What exactly is meant that Ramadasu learns his lesson?
He comes to terms with the reality and apologises for his misdeeds. I have mentioned the same as per your suggestion.

Production

"N. T. Rama Rao and Savitri were chosen for the leads," - leading parts
Done

Music

"Cheyi Cheyi Kaluparave" was parodied by the Indian National Congress as a part of their election campaign during the 1989 general elections." - remove "a"
Done

Release, reception and legacy

"considered the Laurel and Hardy of Telugu cinema at the time." - considered by whom?
It was a film historian's opinion. I have tweaked it accordingly.

References

no dead links
Thanks to Internet Archive.

That is what I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thanks for taking up the review. I've addressed the concerns you have listed above, and i hope that i have succeeded. Yours truly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can now promote to GA review. MWright96 (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]