Talk:Appleby Magna

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Derbyshire Low‑importance

	Derbyshire portal The article on Appleby Magna is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Nice page - I have added some refs although I didnt know where the last three refs referred to in the text. There was no census in 1801 ... is this 1901? Victuallers 15:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1801 census may be correct: Census Act 1800. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 17:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link to St Michael & All Angels Parish Registers added to External Links. Eebdsirhc (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Appleby Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge school

I have suggested that Sir John Moore Church of England Primary School should be merged here as a non-notable primary which doesn't pass WP:GNG, as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Any comments appreciated. CalzGuy (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This is no run-of-the-mill school. Its age and architectural qualities both make it notable. What other primary school has received six million pounds from a heritage fund? S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As a former grammar school (and more than 300 years old) this is notable enough for a separate article.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 18:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, given clear uncontested arguments not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved