Talk:Apollonian and Dionysian

Philosophy: Social and political / Modern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Modern philosophy

. I'm moving this here, because of WP:OR and WP:RS:

Conceptual Examples & Markers

Apollonian: Divine Comedy, Racine, Bach, Mozart, Goethe, Saint John Perse, The Remains of the Day, Superman, Milon, The Enlightenment , Liberalism, Analytic Philosophy, Superego

Dionysian: Holderlin, Wagner, Lautreamont, The Rite of Spring, the beat movement, rock concerts, George Herriman, Batman, Jim Morrison, Arthur Rimbaud, William Blake, Charles Baudelaire, LSD, Milton's Satan, Trainspotting, The Earl of Rochester, The Marquis de Sade, Romanticism, Mysticism, Tragic-Ontology, Post-Modernism, The Rave Movement, Cyberpunk, Id

Aspects of both: Shakespeare, Beethoven, Thomas Mann, Freud, Jazz, Osamu Tezuka, Wonder Woman, Hegel, Master-Slave Morality, Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, Continental Philosophy

Please explain your reasons for inserting it again if you choose to do so. Lapaz 20:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone consider including Cygnus_X-1_series from Rush_(band)?

Franciozzy 12:52, 13 April 2011 (BST)

Nietzsche=German Philosophy?

Actually, Schelling used these terms before Nietzsche did. --178.1.3.228 (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bach Cantata BWV 201

Does'nt Geschwinde, ihr wirbelnden Winde, BWV 201, deals with this subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.229.5.24 (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paglia

It seems to me that Paglia's conception does not "diverge significantly" from Nietzsche's but is entirely incompatible with his. Given this, some reference as to why he is an "admitted influence" on her would be handy. It's exceeding nonsense in any case... Fbunny (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'controversial' on camille paglia's book

No need for the word 'controversial' on camille paglia's book. any book can be called controversial and it seems to me unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akivaragen (talk • contribs) 18:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Any book can be called controversial' - It's a useful term if it describes how the book is received 81.100.232.181 (talk) 06:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use since Paglia

Some novelists in the past few years have explicitly dealt with this theme. I'm thinking of adding a mention in an appropriate place in the article. Doctor Whom (talk) 21:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

philosophical/religious Apollonianism

Technically Apollonians include Olympian God Apollo's philosophy/religion (god of logic with rationalist statements attributed) and followers, and those who strive to be logical. Shouldn't that be mentioned/disambiguated (or in own article)?--dchmelik☀️🕉︎☉🦉🐝🐍☤☆(talk 17:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]