Talk:Antonio (The Merchant of Venice)

This article was nominated for deletion on October 9, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Good job!

Great job on this! I really hate it when people who don't have a clue try to delete these. Let me know if you need help with technical issues. If you could add inline citations, that would be really classy. Oh, I see you do have them! Usually on wikipedia, we put <ref>tags around the inline refs</ref> so they don't get in the way. Wrad 16:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Culturally Insensitive

The opening paragraph seems biased to a western view, many are cultures still face and thus this would present no irony. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.10.162 (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC) However, it gives a clear motivation and explains the book well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.240.59.251 (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and description of Antonio's character

The current description of Antonio's character in the lead is simplistic, to put it mildly - the most convincing performances I have seen portray him as emotionally weak and easily manipulated. If there was some authority behind the current description it might help, although it looks like it has just been made up by some Wikipedia editor whose ideas about the character are pretty superficial. Zargulon (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Antonio (The Merchant of Venice). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense edits. Reverted. (none of the archive links were correct, and one of the archived links wasn't dead) --Xover (talk) 06:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Antonio (The Merchant of Venice). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]