Talk:Anticapitalist and Communist List

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal of incorporation

This list and the Federation of the Left are the same thing. Two pages for one coalition are useless, this page should be incorporated to Federation of the Left --Maremmano (talk) 19:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are not the same thing, but I'm not fully against your proposal. Do you have sources supporting your claim? Many thanks. --Checco (talk) 14:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Substantially they were the same thing, for example we have not two pages for "Sinistra e Libertà" and "Sinistra Ecologia Libertà". In fact SEL is an evolution of "Sinistra e Libertà" and the "Federation of the Left" was an evolution of this list. Moreover i think that "Anticapitalist and Communist List" wasn't the official name of the list. Unfortunately there aren't sources that says it, but two pages on this federation are useless. I will unite the pages --Maremmano (talk) 22:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasoning is about to convince me, but I still think that two pages are the best solution. --Checco (talk) 07:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Checco: "Anticapitalist and Communist List" was not even the official name of the list, it was only an informal name. For me the best solution is certainly a merged article, two pages in this case are useless--Maremmano (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know that it was the informal name, but it was also the most commonly used. As already said, I don't see any particular reason for a joint article, but I'm not strongly opposed to that either. Hopefully other users will tell us what they think. --Checco (talk) 07:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I continue to not see the reason to having two pages for the same federation, it is only dispersive. Moreover, an informal name for a political subject seems me inappropriate--Maremmano (talk) 22:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One was a list, the other a federation: I would keep the two subjects separate. Informal names are often article's names. --Checco (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anticapitalist and Communist List. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090430102315/http://www.unaltraeuropa.eu:80/ to http://unaltraeuropa.eu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]