Talk:Anti-nuclear movement in California

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology: Social Movements Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the social movements task force.

Bias tag

This "article" reads like a blog. No where does it mention the Diablo Canyon or San Onofre nuclear stations, as if they never existed. Nor does it discuss that California imports vast amounts of electricity from the Northwest. Nor does it even have a link to the California electricity crisis. No perspective or greater-picture aspect at all in here. Simesa (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge tag

I hadn't read that California seceded from the U.S. Why a separate article, if such a short one? Simesa (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should keep it. There is a specific state law that forbids new nuclear power plants until the waste problem is solved. Assemblyman Chuck DeVore is trying to repeal this law, see [1]. Paul Studier (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should move it to Nuclear power in California? We can talk about the Rancho Seco, Diablo Canyon, and San Onofre plants, DeVore's efforts to build more, California's exporting of power generation and use, etc. Paul Studier (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I would favor that, or perhaps Nuclear power in the Western U.S.. Certainly there is a complex and very interesting subject here. Simesa (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Feel free to add any criticism of the Anti-nuclear movement in California that is supported by reliable sources. Johnfos (talk) 00:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anti-nuclear movement in California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]