Talk:Annius of Viterbo

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 17 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Annio da Viterbo to Annius of Viterbo. The result of the discussion was moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 12 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Isabellazhang99.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Discussion

A number of issues need to be refined and clarified. A good place to start would be Anthony Grafton's 1991 book Forgers and Critics, which contains a good discussion of how Annius of Viterbo's works were used, discredited, etc., during the early modern period. 124.171.206.233 (talk) 23:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Humanistas estavam imbuído ideologicamente de desacreditar deliberadamente as obras judaico-cristãs existentes desde o inicio da idade média. Não se pode afirmar categoricamente que tais obras realmente eram invenções ou interpolações, como alguns descrentes querem afirmar, pelo contrário, o valor histórico-cultural de tais obras são inestimáveis e refletem com absoluta certeza uma mentalidade proveniente de uma tradição que faz parte do conjunto sócio-histórico-cultural que pelos métodos de análise historiográfico ajudam a construir a história mundial. É lamentável o puro desconstrutivismo sócio-histórico-cultural patrocinado e praticado por pessoas movidas exclusivamente por um sentimentalismo tóximo anti-judaico-cristão. 45.228.98.64 (talk) 18:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annio da Viterbo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060219051905/http://www.italica.rai.it:80/rinascimento/parole_chiave/schede/borgia.htm to http://www.italica.rai.it/rinascimento/parole_chiave/schede/borgia.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De marmoreis volturrhenis tabulis

The cited free paper doesn't indicate if De marmoreis volturrhenis tabulis is still unpublished or not. It was supposed since no work is listed under that title on WorldCat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.51.12.102 (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 05:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Annio da Viterbo → Annius of Viterbo – This ngram suggests that "Annius of Viterbo" is the more prevalent form of his name in English-language sources. Ham II (talk) 20:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 03:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It does seem that the Anglo-Latin form is more common. Srnec (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.