Talk:Angraecum

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Mid‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nectar spur lengths

as far as I know this species has the longest of the nectar spurs, check the book "angraecoids of madagascar" to be sure ~~Orangesquid —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangesquid (talk • contribs) 06:52, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a compilation of the nectar spur lengths of Madagascar Angraecum species? I'd be interested to know if the nectar spur length of A. sesquipedale is much longer than other related species in Madagascar, or whether there is a progression of nectar spur lengths such that one might consider other species to be intermediates? While the original research itself would not be appropriate to the article, I'm thinking that more verifiable detail on the evolutionary aspects of A. sesquipedale could be appropriate to add. --Wesley R. Elsberry 09:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angraecum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929104355/http://research.kahaku.go.jp/database/tukuba_ran/angr.gif to http://research.kahaku.go.jp/database/tukuba_ran/angr.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Malay common name for African genus?

In the lede we currently read:

common name Angrek (Indonesian and Malay)

Since, per the distribution section, this genus is confined natively to Africa and islands of the Indian Ocean, why is there mention of the Malay and Indonesian common name anywhere, but especially in the article's opening sentence? If the genus name is derived from a Malay word then this information may be mentioned further into the article, perhaps in an Etymology section, but self-evidently does not belong in the lede. Any other views before I edit? --Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]