Talk:Angelica Mandy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angelica Mandy redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Vanity Fair, instead?

{{helpme}}

I was wondering if this page should link to the Vanity Fair movie article instead of linking to the list of HP characters. This actress has an actual speaking role in VF, unlike in Harry Potter.

I'd much rather someone more familiar with the Wiki Rules to do the change if it is correct. kkarma (talk) 22:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. It depends which topic people are mostly likely to want if they search for her. I was going to suggest that if she has two good links she's notable enough for her own article, but then I found Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Mandy. Oh, well. Bovlb (talk) 18:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of other thoughts: It's a pity that our determination that she isn't notable enough for her own article forces us to choose between two good redirection targets. Give that the article exists after AFD, the AFD ought to have been mentioned on this talk page. Bovlb (talk) 19:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of adding a Category:Redirects from people tag to this redirect. I believe the intent of this category is to alert editors to create biographies as subjects become more notable. As for a short term solution, I think it's best to redirect to the most notable role, which is probably Harry Potter even though it was minor. Perhaps linking to Weasley family#Gabrielle Delacour would be even better since it has a photo? Hoof Hearted (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Official website"

http://angelicamandy.celebfans.net/

IS not her official website, it is a fansite aka run by a fan and not the actress herself and is in direct violation of WP:ADVERT Pro66 (talk) 22:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What would make it an official website? Mandy has contact with the owners and gives them information/pictures. What else would they need? Duchess of Bathwick (talk · contribs) 02:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"What would make it an official website?" Well for starters the owners wouldn't call it a fansite and for the website to be an official one it must be owned by her or her agents or somewhere on those lines but not by her fans (Fansites are owned and run by fans) otherwise it will come across as advertising regardless of what contact they may have with her. That is why i have removed it coz it is a self-proclaimed fansite and not an official website. Pro66 (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, fair enough. Duchess of Bathwick (talk · contribs) 00:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]