Jump to content

Talk:Angela James

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAngela James has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 4, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Angela James, once called the "Wayne Gretzky of women's ice hockey," was amongst the first three women inducted into the International Ice Hockey Hall of Fame?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Angela James/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Canada Hky (talk · contribs) 02:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Only minor things here. I went through and made a few minor, clean-up type edits before starting this review. If you could review them, and make sure I haven't changed the meaning of anything substantial, that would be great.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Consider making a note of when her international career ended in the lead? Also, when (year) did she step in as a goalie. If this wasn't at the OWHA level, maybe give it a mention.
    Added the end of her international career to lead. And I never could find a source for the specific date of that game as a goalie. Merely the mention that she did play once in that Hockey Canada piece. Resolute 18:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No problems
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    This kind of overlaps a bit with #4, but the sentence about 'not being secretive nor politicizing', could maybe just be left out. Drawing attention to how someone doesn't draw attention to something doesn't quite fit.
    Removed, and I agree that it was awkward. I was trying to convey the viewpoint she expressed as explained in her biography, but kind of botched it. There might be a need for a bit more there, as openly gay athletes are a rarity, but I'm not sure how to word it. Resolute 18:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    See above, but otherwise no problems.
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Not applicable.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Minor issues to fix up or reject, I'll be happy to promote this once they are cleaned up.
    Addressed the two specific comments that I could. The copyediting you did also looks fine. Thanks for the review! Cheers! Resolute 18:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The minor issues I had raised were addressed, I'll promote this to GA. Canada Hky (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Angela James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Angela James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]