Talk:Angel Attack/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 13:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. Good work so far.Tintor2 (talk) 13:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all. The article is kinda Wikipedia:Orphan. Barely 39 articles link it here including talk pages. I would suggest adding the template of Evangelion to the bottom alongside the link of this episode.

I'm currently planning the creation of a template per sé, just like the various episode list from Adventure Time or The Simpsons. Can you wait, while I create other articles and put a more appropriate template?

- Okay.
Is it possible to show a nonfree image for the infobox? Maybe something from the production that stands out or Anno's favorite scene?

Lead

The lead seems a bit small considering the content of the article. I would suggest an elaboration of the development of the episode or what part of the episode is more notable like the usage of weaponry or designs.
Same with the reception's area from the lead. Rather than pointing out reviwers I would consider using a generalization like you did with the other Evangelion characters.

Plot

Misato needs a brief introduction
"named Evangelion, where he is shown Evangelion 01" This might need some clarification. What's the difference between Evangelion and 01? I mean, both are linked. I'm pretty sure it means a series of robots with the same name like Gundams.

Production

Considering the importance of the creators I would suggest linking Anno rather than the weapons unless you put a template for multiple free images.

What do you mean? Put a picture that portrays Anno?

- Yeah, he is the most notable person discussed in the article and has free image in contrast to the other references.

Reception

I would suggest trimming some quotes and instead paraprhase some responses. It happened to me once when an edit I once made to an article got erased.

Anyways, that's all I found so far. I doubt I might find other issues but ping me when you are finished with this. Good work in the article. Also if possible, could you check this peer review when the review is over? RegardsTintor2 (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Tried my best with the rest.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TeenAngels1234: Passing My issues were solved. I still think that you should at least link the episode to the Evangelion template. No rush needed. Kinda like the Pokemon articles that have some animated episodes.Tintor2 (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]