Talk:Andrew Robinson (actor)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'm re-reviewing this article for GA sweeps. Upon reading it, I feel that the following need to be fixed for the article to retain GA status:

Refs #3 and 10 (USC and Scifi online) are deadlinks.
Some references don't look reliable. Namely, #2 (plain-and-simple.net) is something written up by the fan club, and there's no way of knowing that what they've written is true. Ref #12 (island trek) is from geocities, where there's no way of gauging reliability.
The second paragraph of early life is unsourced, and I can tell that ref #3 would not have had most of the info in that paragraph.
The career section flows oddly, jumping to different time frames. For example, the last paragraph of deep space nine should be its own post-DS9 section and expanded upon.
In general, the paragraph-to-paragraph flow is poor. Not easy to explain, but basically it will jump from 1971 to 1973 to 1970 then to 1986. It tries to combine things non-chronologically that should be in a separate or earlier section, such as meeting his wife (which was even before dirty harry)

I'll put this on hold and give you five days to fix everything. If no progress, I'll delist it as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to address your concerns, but I don't have much familiarity with the subject. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 18:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright; I'll give you an extra day or two to start things off, will delist on Sunday if nothing happens. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No work done, so article delisted. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]