Jump to content

Talk:Andrew Robinson (actor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAndrew Robinson (actor) was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 9, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 1, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
March 12, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 14, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Untitled

[edit]

at the top is says he was in 37 episodes lower down it says he appeared in 41 of the 176 episodes i just noticed this, and have no idea which is right —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.134.250.1 (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article says "Currently[when?] he is heading a MFA program in acting at the USC.." At http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jan/14/entertainment/ca-robinson14 which is dated 2007, it says "...dean of USC's School of Theatre, who recruited Robinson three years ago to plan and run the new acting program." Could someone change the article to say "Since 2004 he has headed..." with the LA Times a reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.80.154.77 (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Andrew Robinson (actor)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I'm re-reviewing this article for GA sweeps. Upon reading it, I feel that the following need to be fixed for the article to retain GA status:

  • Refs #3 and 10 (USC and Scifi online) are deadlinks.
  • Some references don't look reliable. Namely, #2 (plain-and-simple.net) is something written up by the fan club, and there's no way of knowing that what they've written is true. Ref #12 (island trek) is from geocities, where there's no way of gauging reliability.
  • The second paragraph of early life is unsourced, and I can tell that ref #3 would not have had most of the info in that paragraph.
  • The career section flows oddly, jumping to different time frames. For example, the last paragraph of deep space nine should be its own post-DS9 section and expanded upon.
  • In general, the paragraph-to-paragraph flow is poor. Not easy to explain, but basically it will jump from 1971 to 1973 to 1970 then to 1986. It tries to combine things non-chronologically that should be in a separate or earlier section, such as meeting his wife (which was even before dirty harry)

I'll put this on hold and give you five days to fix everything. If no progress, I'll delist it as a GA. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to address your concerns, but I don't have much familiarity with the subject. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 18:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alright; I'll give you an extra day or two to start things off, will delist on Sunday if nothing happens. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No work done, so article delisted. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]