Talk:Andrew Harclay, 1st Earl of Carlisle

Andrew Harclay, 1st Earl of Carlisle has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 20, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 25, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Edward II of England made Andrew Harclay (pictured) Earl of Carlisle in 1322, only to have him executed less than a year later?

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Andrew Harclay, 1st Earl of Carlisle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: - Philippe 12:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Nicely done
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	On the whole, an exceptional article. Well written and concise.

Requested move 24 June 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Harclay, 1st Earl of Carlisle → Andrew Harclay, Earl of Carlisle – Ordinal numbers are used in peers' names when they need to be distinguished from other holders of the title. This man was the only holder of the Earldom of Carlisle, meaning no such distinction is necessary. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 06:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC) Zacwill16 (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NCNOB and per User:Necrothesp's rationale at Talk:William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin#Requested move 26 June 2015 which covers exactly the same issue. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.