Talk:Andrew Crosse

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Insects

According to Faraday: The Life,

'Faraday was drawn into the dispute, and gently remarked that he had no opinion to offer. So mildly did he state his position that the press thought he was actually supporting Crosse, and he had to retrieve his reputation with some urgent clarification.'

From this, it would seem that Faraday did not intend to offer his support to Crosse, but this article implies that he did support him... Ben davison 19:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reference removed

external link removed via user:JzG edit

An account of his experiment can be viewed here http://www.rexresearch.com/crosse/crosse.htm .From the pen of the man himself.

J. D. Redding 22:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier Book

The article suggests the idea of Crosse being a source for Victor frankenstein comes from a 1998 book. However, there is a much earlier book which deals with this. Haining, Peter. The Man Who Was Frankenstein. London: Frederick Muller, 1979. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.190.69.142 (talk) 10:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - thanks for the info. Article changed and references added 79.79.185.107 (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Crosse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His letter of 1840 - published

See Philosophical Journal Sept 1840 p215 On the tension spark from the voltaic battery. Says he has a water battery of 1200 zinc and copper cylinders. - Rod57 (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voltaic Pile vs Voltaic Battery/Leydan Jar

The following paragraph, on a cursory reading, seems to have issues: Along with Sir Humphry Davy (who visited Fyne Court in 1827), Crosse was one of the first to develop large voltaic piles.[3] Although it was not the largest he built, Henry Minchin Noad's Manual of Electricity describes a battery consisting of 50 jars containing 73 square feet (6.8 m2) of coated surface. Using his wires Crosse was able to charge and discharge it some 20 times a minute, "accompanied by reports almost as loud as those of a cannon".[2] He became known locally as "the thunder and lightning man". In 1836 Sir Richard Phillips described seeing a wide variety of voltaic piles at Fyne Court, totalling 2,500, of which 1,500 were in use when he visited.[4]

True:

   Along with Sir Humphry Davy (who visited Fyne Court in 1827), Crosse was one of the first to develop large voltaic piles.[3]

But the following is describing Crosse's "Voltaic Battery" which is an old (and confusing) term for a Leyden jar. Therefore the following does not amplify the previous true sentence. 'Battery' here is not a 'pile'.

   Although it was not the largest he built, Henry Minchin Noad's Manual of Electricity describes a battery consisting
   of 50 jars containing 73 square feet (6.8 m2) of coated surface.

Crosse's Voltaic piles are, however, correctly mentioned in what follows (Crosse had 2500 voltaic pile, *not* 50. 50 would not have generated enough voltage for Crosse to be called the thunder-and-lightning man!):

   Using his wires Crosse was able to charge and discharge it some 20 times a minute, "accompanied by reports almost as loud as those of a cannon".[2]
   He became known locally as "the thunder and lightning man". 
   In 1836 Sir Richard Phillips described seeing a wide variety of voltaic piles at Fyne Court, totalling 2,500, of which 1,500 were in use when he visited.[4]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.148.94.222 (talk) 00:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]