Talk:Andreas Eenfeldt

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Alternative views

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Dr. Andreas Eenfeldt Draft Submission

My name is Anna Hecht and I work for the article-subject Andreas Eenfeldt. I would like to help expand this page into a proper biography with an infobox, an early life section, etc. while complying with WP:COI. I put together a draft here that I think would dramatically improve the quality and completeness of the page. If a volunteer has time to review the draft and implement all or parts of it, it would be of great assistance. Best regards. AnnaHecht1993 (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry for the delay. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saturated Fat is Good or Bad?

I've examined the reference [2] for the following text and find (using Google and Bing translations) the meaning confirmed. But the meaning perversely contradicts, or at least does not support, the thesis the doctor/(entrepreneur?) is trying to present:

' He [Eenfeldt] has commented that "there is no good science to show that saturated fat is bad. I have been in contact with many experts but no one has been able to show me a single study that shows that it is dangerous, because there are no studies that show a reduced risk of heart attack and stroke." ' [emph. added]

The word for "reduced" in Swedish in the original is "minskad", and the internet agrees that that is what it means. One would expect the adjective to be "increased". Else the plain meaning of the text is the equivalent of:

Saturated fat is safe because there are no studies (that I have seen) showing it to be helpful to reduce bad stuff.

WUT

The reference I used was the archived version. Its original could not be accessed. Perhaps the wording will have been updated? Because the original is either just plain weird, or I haven't had enough coffee this morning. JohndanR (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He's saying there are no studies showing a reduced risk of heart disease from limiting saturated fat consumption. He's entirely wrong about this as many studies could be cited going back 50 years. He is a blatant science denier. Here is the actual comment from him:

"Då började jag läsa ännu mer och kom fram till att det är mycket mer effektivt att ta bort kolhydrater än att ta bort mättat fett. Det finns ingen bra vetenskap som visar att mättat fett är dåligt. Jag har haft kontakt med många experter men ingen har kunnat visa mig en enda studie som visar att det är farligt, för det finns inga studier som visar minskad risk för hjärtinfarkt och stroke".

Which translates to:

"Then I started reading even more and came to the conclusion that cutting out carbohydrates is much more effective than cutting out saturated fat. There is no good science to show that saturated fat is bad. I have been in contact with many experts but no one has been able to show me a single study that shows that it is dangerous, because there are no studies that show a reduced risk of heart attack and stroke." Psychologist Guy (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]