Talk:Ancient monument

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient ?

I don't know what the precise UK legal definition is, but many building classified as "ancient monuments" seem to be only about 150 years ago, which would not be in correspondence with the usual plain meaning of the word "ancient". Such as "ancient greece and rome". It would be useful if someone expert in this issue adds information about how old something has to be, to qualify. Lathamibird (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Are you sure you don't mean listed buildings? You don't seem to have read the short article here very closely, or looked at Scheduled monument, where there is much more, explaining why there is no simple answer. Johnbod (talk) 03:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The OP is right: plenty of scheduled monuments aren't what most people would consider ancient. For example, The Iron Bridge (see [1]) and Magpie Mine in Derbyshire ([2]), off the top of my head. I've proposed merging Ancient monument and Scheduled monument for this reason. Dave.Dunford (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or how about the cruise missile shelter complex at Greenham Common, a scheduled monument built in the 1950s. Dave.Dunford (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ancient monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120501093448/http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/ to http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.