Talk:Ancient Order of United Workmen Temple

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Refs for expansion

Restore Oregon re: appeal to LUBA and the City of Portland.
Lovely photos and info from our own @Lockley:

Valfontis (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Valfontis:! yes indeed, thank you for noticing, and I could be persuaded to upload 2 or 3 of those photos into the commons if this is an article somebody wants to tackle.... I'm particularly interested in any older photos that show the original cornice, which has been removed. I suspect it was a beaut. --Lockley (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't promise anything, since I am working on several articles right now and waiting to at least 7 to receive Good article nominations, but I would like to see this article expanded, either by myself or other editors. I can appreciate your preference to upload images after an article is improved, but at least know there is interest in this article and others who would appreciate your pictures of the building. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No promises here either, but although we are not supposed to advocate, I'd hate to see this building go, so sprucing this up seems like a good idea. For starters, @Lockley: do you think you could upload the lead picture from your article, just to give folks an idea what it looks like? I may have a crappy photo or two in my archives as I used to work in the area. Any ideas where to start looking to find cornice pics? Valfontis (talk) 22:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found a cornice pic. It makes so much more sense with the cornice! Valfontis (talk) 22:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded three photos, and I may have a whack or two at the article. --Lockley (talk) 09:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]