Talk:Anax ephippiger

Hemianax or Anax

The only references in the article both point to Hemianax being the former genus. Wikispecies also puts it in Hemianax but IUCN uses Anax. Which is it? I plan to move it back to Anax if there are no strong references supplied. Dger (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From IUCN: "This species, formerly included in the genus Hemianax, is increasingly included in the genus Anax. As no genetic investigation is available, this remains controversial."

So I guess there's no consensus. I added that info to the article. --Exonie 18:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exonie (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hemianax ephippiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 October 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move, therefore, moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hemianax ephippiger → Anax ephippiger – Anax ephippiger is the name used in most references now, including World Odonata List. J e e 14:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Taxonomy moves on. Recent sources are going with Anax ephippiger. Plantdrew (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Dragonfly Porto_Covo_August_2021-4.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for February 25, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-02-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! — Amakuru (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anax ephippiger, commonly known as the vagrant emperor, is a species of dragonfly in the family Aeshnidae.

Photograph credit: Joaquim Alves Gaspar

Recently featured:

Expand blurb on main page

One sentence, seventeen words. Really? The blurb for the day's featured picture is usually much longer than that. I am RedoStone (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]