Talk:Analytic phonics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

[Untitled]

This article confuses two distinct terms: systematic phonics instruction and explicit phonics instruction.

This is not good because the topic of phonics instruction has a history of controversy.

Didn't phonics instruction become part of mainstream practice as a response to Whole Language instruction? That controversy lasted for years and was heated.

Now here, the confusion of terms leads the writer to say that analytical phonics instruction is a type of whole word instruction.

A possible correction would be to say that analytic phonics is explicit but not systematic phonics instruction...that would be consistent with the rest of the article...

Or possibly not systematic in a particular sense....

Another worry with this article is that it suggests that there are only two options for teaching phonics. Actually, it's a young enough field that we can't know what illumination practice will yield within the next decade, assuming English spelling is not reformed in that time....

Possibly the problem is that synthetic phonics has been adopted as a label by practitioners of a particular method, while the term analytic phonics seems to be a generalization about various alternative methods....

....ok I get it - the sources cited themselves are confusing. It looks like phonics teaching is fast evolving....

I hope someone within this field will fix this up, thanks....Serene bioggio (talk) 11:56, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Analytical phonics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed name to Analytic phonics

Hi folks. I changed the name because analytic phonics is the the accepted name in most places and has been so for many years. Here are some examples: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf Page 2-89. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100512233640/http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/0201-2006PDF-EN-01.pdf Page 19. And I found many more current uses.John (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed IPA

In my view, IPA is not necessary in this article. Most readers will understand English pronunciation, and teachers and tutors do not use IPA with students.John (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]