Talk:An Inconvenient Book

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Book reviews

In the section -Major rhetorical devices-, is it useful to refer to a book review composed by a book seller? (Editorial Reviews from Barnes & Noble) - Insterested (talk) 03:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removed comments

I've removed two of the blurbs from Amazon, since separate research reveals they almost certainly have no connection to the book at all. Circeus (talk) 04:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Back Cover Quote

After looking over a hard copy of the book, I found a quote by John Stewart on the back cover reading "Finally, someone who's not afraid to say what people who don't think, actually think." The prominence of the quote, given in the style of the review blurbs often seen on back covers, confused me given the pejorative tone. As I'm sure publishers would notice an insulting quote during the editing process, that implies it was included purposefully, leaving the motives behind this book in question. To sum up, is Mr. Beck taking this book seriously? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.170.237 (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a forum. Secondly, if you noticed, all of the blurbs on the back insult Glenn Beck, and I think that the entire book contains a good amount of satire, and the back cover is no exception. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The book contains satire, but the contents of the book are intended to be serious. Beck puts mocking quotes on the back of most of his political books becuase they are amusing. This appears to be standard practice for him. 192.249.47.165 (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of Tony Sidaway's revert of an edit by 69.181.229.54

I've reverted this edit because it seems to be stating as a fact that there is no scientific consensus on global warming, which is contradicted by all available reliable sources. --TS 21:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for working with me on the reword. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]