Talk:Amorphophallus
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Repeated article
[edit]Hi everyone,
I'm sorry because I might have missed some of the guidelines which might be required, please tell me if I forgot any, thanks.
Anyway, I just wanted to tell you guys that there are 2 articles which have different titles which talk about the same subject, these two articles are Amorphophallus (which is this article) and Titan arum, I think that they should both be joined together into one article.
Thanks,
Cpt Adham (talk) 19:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- No. Amorphophallus describes the genus, while Titan arum describes a specific species. JoJan (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
ok, so should I delete this discussion article or leave it? I also have another discussion article which has the same content its on the Titan arum discussion page, should I delete that also?
I'm sorry for this small mess that I've made,
Cpt Adham (talk) 13:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just leave it as it is. JoJan (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
More than "famine foods"
[edit]If you search for konjac you will find at least one member of this genus is now a fad food. One web page with a title of "Miracle Noodle - Konjac Flour" sells konjac flour, and my wife picked up noodles in the store using the flour. 24.91.82.29 (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amorphophallus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110426184634/http://www.cate-araceae.org:80/taxonomy/Amorphophallus to http://www.cate-araceae.org/taxonomy/Amorphophallus
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)