Talk:American Center for Law & Justice

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Abortion

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Laughably biased

This entry is so biased that one can't help but laugh out loud at it. The only thing the "author" of this entry could think to write about the ACLJ in the opening is that it is a pro-life, coservative Christian organization founded by Pat Robertson? One whole sentence? The history section is equally pathetic. The ACLJ has been around for almost twenty years, and the "author" of this entry wrote a grand total of three small paragraphs about the organization, with one being this gem:"ACLJ supported blocking the construction of the center through New York City’s Landmarks Preservation Commission, though the ACLJ in the past has opposed efforts (or what it perceived as efforts) to block churches in the same way." Nah, no bias here. None at all. Here is another "great" sentence from the equally skimpy European section: "The ECLJ is active in the United Nations Organization and in the Council of Europe, and represents the interests of certain Christians in the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg." Certain Christians? Hmm, for the life of me, I can't figure out why the word certain was used in that sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.153.10 (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is common to hate the ACLU for their extremism. One can see where this extremism if you take a minute and consider what they are about. They are about "rights" even if it means defending the rights of the despicable. They are not defending the actions of the despicable, they are making sure that the rights of the despicable are respected so that everyones rights are respected. The ACLJ is supposedly a counter balance to this supposed leftist liberal extremism. They achieve this and more. They are extreme on the right but pay scant attention to their supposed purpose. They are a blatant right wing religious PAC with a tenuous hold on truth and reason. I am not sure about the laws governing "nonprofit" status but I don't think they care much about that either. They head counsel or president (whatever his title) parades around Washington in paid limos, dines on the nonprofits dime lavishly and employs his own sons in high paid senior positions. A real family money making enterprise that only the GOP can love. I am on their email subscription list. You wouldn't believe the biased misleading drek that pores out of these hate mongers in the name of Jesus and fair play. To them Israel is part of the United States and not a entirely separate country. I just received an email calling for the resignation of Attorney General Holder for his nefarious refusal to comply with a partisan congressional committee and for using "executive privilege". This presumably is not valid unless a republican president uses it. What did they say when Pat Robertson was using his Christian mission in africa to helicopter supplies to Charles Taylor so he could finance his Child Army with slave labor to mine diamonds? You may remember Charles Taylor, he was the guy just given a life sentence at The Hague for genocide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.125.240.130 (talk) 17:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

There are several unsourced claims in this article. In addition, many of the links provided for reference are either dead or link to irrelevant articles. This article needs a major clean-up in this respect. --EECEE (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Center for Law & Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706164543/http://www.eclj.org/About/ to http://www.eclj.org/About/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic photos

There's no established specific connection between the removed photos and the article about the organization. Activist (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]