Talk:Amelia Kinkade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amelia Kinkade article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This page was proposed for deletion by WikiLeon (talk · contribs) on 8 March 2007.
It was contested by Groggy Dice (talk · contribs) with the comment:
lead in Night of the Demons, which seems to be a cult classic

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2020. The result of the discussion was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Girls Just Want to Have Fun

Does anyone know if she was a dancer in the "Girls Just Want to Have Fun" film, or in the Cyndi Lauper music video? If it was the film, the link needs to be modified to reflect that. Gil gosseyn (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reaction

This section seems a bit out of place in its current form. The blockquote syntax seems a bit undue and it combines reviews of both her acting and writing. Perhaps there's a better way to incorporate the content contained into the section into the other sections of the article? -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We could certainly split it into sub-sections, one for her work as an actress, and one for her books. It is my view that a "critical reaction" or "critical response" section is usually the best way to present reviewsm of a creative person's work, particularly when these are being used in part to establish notability. I think it only confuses things to have reviews mixed in with an account of the work itself. Wikipedia:Quotations r3eccomends that blockquote be used for quotations lo9nger than 40 words. So does MOS:BLOCKQUOTE. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's just the location of the section as a whole which seems odd to me. It seems like it should come before the "Books" (i.e. Bibliography) section per MOS:BIB. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the comments on the books should come after the list of books, but that is a detail, and i wouldn't object to the section being moved before the list of publications. Does anyone else have a view on this? DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I've temporarily hid the infobox because it's way (in my opinion) a WP:DISINFOBOX than not. The article isn't really that long to begin with, but there's no need infobox that basically is just the MOS:LEAD in template form. Even if a freely-licensed image were found to use in the article, such a overly simple infobox probably wouldn't be needed. If the article continues to be expanded allowing more of the relevant parameters of infobox to be populated, then perhaps it would make sense to have one. This was a WP:BOLD edit, but I'm just adding a bit more of explanation as to why I made it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: I agree—thanks for commenting it out for the time being. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel strongly about the infobox one way or the other. The only changes I made were to add "dancer" and to remove the exact DOB, leaving only the year, as per WP:DOB. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tags

Girls Just Want to Have Fun

Critical reaction

Infobox