Talk:Ambulance (2022 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk · contribs) 08:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will be taking this one; I enjoyed this movie. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have begun reviewing the article and just finished with the entire Production. Though I'm happy to announce that this section mostly pass the GA criteria, I feel like the following texts fail criterion 2b for being either unsourced or failing verification against source provided:

*In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles affected Bay's career and canceled his plans to shoot his next film, Black Five. He recalled telling his agent "Goddamnit, I just want to get out and shoot something fast. I'm tired of being locked up at home".

The production also hired real trauma surgeons, firefighters, SWAT teams, snipers, and 52 LAPD officers for the shoot.

Will continue with the rest later. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, back to reviewing.

Sections from Release down to Reception pass criterion 2a. However, the following texts, while not necessarily unreferenced, need inline citations to maintain text-source integrity:

The first trailer was shown at CinemaCon on August 25, 2021
It was projected to gross $8–14 million from 3,412 theaters in its opening weekend
The film made $3.2 million on its first day, including $700,000 from Thursday night previews

Prose review

Ambulance received mixed reviews from critics who saw it as a return to form for Bay, though the story drew occasional criticism. -> please copyedit for this to be "well written". This needs citation, too
Ambulance has grossed $21.8 million -> fix double spacing in 21.8 million
and the Winter Olympics as well as re-runs of The Big Bang Theory. -> place a comma before as well as
Cam tries to convince Will to stop Danny to no avail -> comma before to no avail
Wikilink B movie
I believe there's one instance of "multiples [sic] sources" inline that needs fixing

Would be happy to give this article a pass once these issues are resolved. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: Done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. I'm happy with the changes overall, though I had to do some minor ones here in there. I'm therefore pleased to announce that this article has passed the Good Article criteria. It's well-written and sourced, broad, neutral, stable, and supported with licensed images. You may be interested in nominating the article for WP:DYK, as it's a newly-promoted GA. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]