Talk:Amazon Relational Database Service

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Advertisement?

The current description reads like an ad.

I agree. What template can be used to mark this article as such? άλφα7248^Talk 15:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got the same feeling from reading this page. All that it's missing is pricing and contact information. 17:15, 22 August 2012 (PST)

Adding Information on Competitors

I suggest adding a section about alternative solutions to this product - this will help make the entry more objective and will put this product in context of what is available in the marketplace. I'm aware of quite a few other cloud databases that could be considered as alternatives. They can be divided up according to the database technology supported - Oracle, Microsoft SQL and MySQL. Any thoughts/objections? Anne.naimoli (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since there are no objections, I'm adding the section Anne.naimoli (talk) 13:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]