Talk:Amalia of Oldenburg

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Greece: Politics

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Politics and politicians task force.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"She also remained a Roman Catholic, in an almost universally Orthodox country, throughout her reign."

Please check your sources! King Otto WAS a Catholic but I'm pretty sure Queen Amalia was a Protestant. - JG

Move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was to move this page --Lox (t,c) 08:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that this article be moved to Amalia of Oldenburg, to keep in line with the naming conventions for deceased queen consorts. Prsgoddess187 13:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unobstructed and uncontroversial move which conforms to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (see Past Royal Consorts) and I would have moved it now, but I just wanted to check something: Why does the article title contain 'Amalia' while the article itself refers to 'Amelie' - I imagine it's something to do with the national equivalent to 'Amelie', but perhaps you'd know? Ta! --Lox (t,c) 21:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why the article is Amalia and in the text she is referred to as Amalie, but it is probably the national equivalent. In that case, she should be under Amalie of Oldenburg. Prsgoddess187 22:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you don't mind, I'd prefer your original suggestion of Amalia of Oldenburg, since most of our article, our external link and our reference all use the name "Amalia" and to correct the spelling at the top of the article. Of course, if you or anyone else disagrees, please say so - I don't really want to speed this move through and would prefer to wait the prescribed five days. --Lox (t,c) 09:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan to me. I think Amalia is a better option as well. Prsgoddess187 12:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Succession Box for Consort

I am not sure this makes sense. One is consort by virtue of one's spouse's title. It is not devisable by the person themself, and it is not an "office" or title. It is a courtesy title, I think. So, I would propose that we not use a Succession Box for consorts. Thoughts?Argos'Dad 15:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just don't call it a succession box. I don't see the problem of having it. Charles 15:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We already have it in British, French and Spanish consorts. Hardly a new development. User:Dimadick

Religion

She was probably born Lutheran but did she converted to Roman Catholicism after her marriage. And what was her view on Greek Orthodoxy.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why she could not have children.

This wikipedia article says that post mortem she was found to have the condition it describes. This condition prevents pregnancy. Müllerian agenesis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.71.210.133 (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Amalia of Oldenburg/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article meets all the criteria of B class except with respect to references and citations.

Referencing and citation: criterion not met 
Coverage and accuracy: criterion met 
Structure: criterion met 
Grammar: criterion met

Supporting materials: criterion met Argos'Dad 20:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amalia of Oldenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello This picture is from my website and not free for copy...please delete the picture and the link. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Joseph_Karl_Stieler?uselang=nl#/media/File:Amalia_of_Oldenburg.jpg

The original is from my website and cropped without permission. https://royal-magazin.de/german/oldenburg/koenigin-amalia-wittelsbach-griechenland.htm You could easy see the background - from the orginal, which I had taken and prepared. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:4740:A574:3D42:7868:4F74:43A5 (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Intersex

I can't find any mention of her being Intersex in the article but the category Intersex people is here.★Trekker (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]