Talk:Alternative versions of the Hulk
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alternative versions of the Hulk redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 31 July 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]Ultimate Hulk doesn't eat the Abomination. He just rips off his arms and smashes his skull. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.85.216.191 (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Also, it's been stated by Bendis (creator of the Ultimate Marvel universe and Ultimate Origin) that Richard and Mary Parker are merely unconcious, not dead, in the final scene. I can't find citation for this, but it is backed up by anyone who reads Ultimate Spider-Man and knows that his parents died in a plane crash. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.21.133.144 (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Ultimate Hulk powers and abilities
[edit]It would be nice if the section about Ultimate Hulk had a subsection about his 'Powers and abilities.' Especially to show how it's different from Hulk 2099 or mainstream Hulk. Anyone want to volunteer to add that? Freak104 20:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree with this. Since reading Ultimate Human it's shown that Ultimate Hulk has Reactive Evolution that functions much faster than 616 Hulk's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.125.84 (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Should the article be expanded to show the different variations of Ultimate Hulk like being able to take on all original avengers or X-Men in at once but then lose very easily to Zarda? (aka Power Princess.) Even though the story wasn't thought out (IMO) the fact that he lost so easily should show that this version of the Hulk does not reach the strength level of the 616 Hulk as well as his fighting ability.
2099
[edit]Having Hulk 2099 as a separate article violates WP:Fancruft, so please don't unmerge it from this article. Thanks. Freak104 16:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- WP:Fancruft is clear that it is an essay and not even a guideline. Now you might be correct in what you did but you'd need a better arguement that that. (Emperor 00:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC))
No Merge I agree with the previous discussion, these are completely seperate characters only connected by the "Hulk" name. I've added merge tags and put a notice up on the comics project to this discussion to end the edit war thats been going on with these two pages. -- 69.182.73.240 03:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
No Merge - the character appeared in his own series and was the launching pad for 2099 Unlimited series. The character has no connection to the Hulk other than name, they are wholly separate characters. The characters of 2099 represent a distincitive imprint, and unlike fancruft Hulk 2099 has an established publication history. Hulk 2099 deserves mention, but not to be merged wholly into this article. 66.109.248.114 20:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
No Merge - agree with above, and the previous decision in February. Terrypin 13:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
No merge I was wrong to merge them originally. Sorry. Freak104 02:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Discussion close with consensus of no merge.- 66.109.248.114 08:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Masterohulk32.png
[edit]
Image:Masterohulk32.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ultimates 5.jpg
[edit]Image:Ultimates 5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
B-Class Assesment required
[edit]This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 11:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Clean-Up needed.
[edit]Most of this article is a list of different versions. Few, if any, assert real-world notability, most are written in a ridiculously fannish style, exhibit too much detail for too little content, and the only sources are 3 comics and a Marvel.com page, which is not a good source, because Marvel comics runs Marvel.com, creating a CoI for the reliability of the information found there. ThuranX (talk) 22:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, this whole thing could be reduced to 2 or 3 paragraphs. I'm just working on the Hal Jordan article but I'll be back.... --Cameron Scott (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary citation tag
[edit]I am removing the "citation needed" tag from this sentence in the Earth X section of this article:
- "In an interview in Comicology Volume I: The Kingdom Come Companion, Alex Ross said that the design of Earth-X Banner and Hulk was based on the appearance of Moon-Boy and Devil Dinosaur."
Exactly why would a citation be required for a sentence that explicitly states its own source? Sometimes I think certain editors just see a paragraph without umpteen citation links and throw "citation needed" at it without reading the content. -- Pennyforth (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)