Talk:Altavista petroglyph complex

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed text

I've removed most of the text formerly at this article- it is a reproduction of material appearing on this site. Unable to establish whether the wiki article or the ext site has the priority, but given the wiki article appeared mostly intact, suspect copyvio. I suppose it's possible that the article's creator (coincidentally now banned for 1 year for another matter) and the website's author are one and the same, though if so it's not indicated anywhere. In any case, according to an early version of this article, the text only reproduces the contents of signage at the site, supposedly written by INAH.

Either way, this doesn't seem appropriate content (and what's more some of the claims seem rather dubious). Needs to be re-researched and written from scratch.--cjllw ʘ TALK 08:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Attempt

I have writen the article in Spanish Altavista (Nayarit), with text translated from the source page and author. Then retranslated that text back to english. Please confirm this is OK. While at it, I need the format to set up site boxes (with relevant information), can do it in spanish, but unable to add to english articles.Thanks--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Before writing the article did extensive research, could not find any INAH references.--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 00:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dating error re: Tecoxquin culture

The article states, "Tecoxquin (Tequectequi) native culture dating from approximately 2000 BC to 2300 BCE.[2]"  BC and BCE are equivalent, so this date makes no sense.  I was unable to access the source cited in the footnote.  The date needs correction.

Naty6068 (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for Altavista petroglhyph 21° 5' 29.57" N 105° 9' 59.85" W

—{{{1}}}

Done, though I've rounded the rather overprecise coordinates you've given above. Checked by means of the map here. (The coordinates that were previously in the article were for a location in the ocean.) Deor (talk) 12:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Altavista petroglyph complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]