Talk:Alt-America

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Sources list

NYJOB review (full-length review)
Alt-America and English Uprising review – Trump, Brexit and the far right (The Guardian, long review)
Kirkus Review (blurb-length review)
Where the alt-right wants to take America — with or without Trump (4-5 paragraphs)

Jlevi (talk) 21:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Footnote 1 includes a DOI that leads to an entirely different review of the book than the one cited. Are any of the current uses of Footnote 1 meant to be cited to that other review? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weird! No, I'll remove it. Also, why do you keep removing the wikidata infobox? I prefer to add metadata there, rather than just in the infobox. If you have any particular reason, I would be curious to hear about it. Jlevi (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has issues with regards to formatting and overspecificity, and I don't see any associated benefit that would outweigh those concerns. This version is cleaner and includes the missing genre. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting preference seems rather in the eye of the beholder. Further, I intend to add metadata primarily through the wikidata interface for now, and I prefer those modifications show up automatically. Given that I am actively adding content to the page, I would like to keep the infobox as I initially included it for that reason. Once the page is more stable, perhaps we can chat about this matter again. Sound fair? Jlevi (talk) 21:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your proposed timeframe? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just depends on how much additional content I find. Jlevi (talk) 01:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As it's been a week since either the article or the Wikidata item have been changed, I've restored the local version. Nikkimaria (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]