Jump to content

Talk:Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAlready Gone (Kelly Clarkson song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 7, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 27, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
July 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 10, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 7, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kelly Clarkson fought to prevent her record company, RCA, from releasing her song "Already Gone" as a single?
Current status: Good article

Billboard critique

[edit]

In this edit, User:115.128.17.12 added the following without a refrence:

Billboard critic Jonathon Nguyen writes "Regardless of the controversey behind the tracks similarity to Halo, Already Gone boasts its own unique arrangement that is almost oblvious to the common listener. The rock infused ballad is reminiscent of Clarkson's previous hit Because of You, but even though her vocals sing proud, it fails to deliver the same appeal".

I'm moving it here until it can be referenced, and then we can add it back to the article. I did a search for some of the text but came up with nothing yet. Matthewedwards :  Chat  20:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hand claps?

[edit]

Somebody needs to fix that part about "hand claps". The percussive instrument playing the beat is a snare drum, not a clap. 75.164.34.243 (talk) 05:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence mentions how it has been described by a reliable third party source. verifiability, not truth. Matthewedwards :  Chat  05:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Musicnotes

[edit]

Alfred Music Publishing owns the Musicnotes.com website. You can read about the site at http://www.musicnotes.com/aboutus.asp. It most certainly meets WP:RS. Further, most all the WP:FAs and WP:GAs use Musicnotes to explain the key, chord progression, etc etc of a song. Why would it be called unreliable? Matthewedwards :  Chat  05:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was always under the impression that reliable sources based on a program you would have to download to your computer were not reliable sources. After having checked some FAs and GAs, I see that you are correct and they are used there, so I withdraw my objection to the reliable source sentence. On the other hand the sheet music image is not needed. If the sentence is backed up by a reliable source, then the information the image is conveying is already expressed in the article. Aspects (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
With no objection in over two weeks, I am going to remove the sheet music image. Aspects (talk) 14:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charts.

[edit]

Someone need to add the Hot AC charts were she has had her first number 1 hit since 'Behind These Hazel Eyes' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.22.69 (talk) 16:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

componant charts don't get aded because they make up the mainstream charts that do get added WP:GOODCHARTS Alan - talk 19:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HJMitchell You rang? 06:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article appears stable, it is very well written, comprehensive and referenced where required. I see no obvious impediments to GA status so this should be fairly quick (now I've got round to it, apologies for the delay). However, since you're aiming for eventual FA status, I'll be thorough and we'll get into the minutiae. HJMitchell You rang? 16:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

minor, general points

  • careful with the apostrophes (yeah, that winds me up!)
  • name "the song" or "the music video" for the first mention in each section
  • careful with the ""- make sure Already Gone is always in "" or ''. I've corrected it at least once and I've not seen it again, but be careful

Specifics

  • Lead:
    • the 2nd sentence (I think) the article says "It appears on..." (album)- Is it worth tweaking to join the previous sentence with "from.." or "appearing on..." or something similar?
    • I would suggest bringing the first mention of Tedder further up (i.e first sentence) for example "performed by Kelly Clarkson and cowritten by Clarkson and Ryan Tedder..." or something similar
      • I tried it there, but I think it made the sentence too long. After connecting the first two sentences as suggested above, it now appears in the second sentence, and I think that should be okay. Matthewedwards :  Chat 
    • There needs to be some explanation of the chronology- especially when the song was written- because it goes on to talk about Halo which was released before Already Gone- do I take it AG was written before Halo?
      • As far as I know, yes. His collaborations with Kelly were the first he'd done with another artist, apparently. It just happened that Beyonce's album was released first. I think I've explained this better now. Matthewedwards :  Chat 
    • It jumps straight from Clarkson's objections to AG's release to her promotion of it. I know there's only so much detail we can cram into the lead but the impression is given that she just 'got over it' and went out promoting a song she thinks is a rip off of Beyonce. The stuff about her objections should be wrapped up a little neater to clarify that.
      • Not sure how to address this properly. I read in some forum somewhere that Clive Davis had threatened to stop promoting the album completely if she did not promote the single, but I can't find a RS for this. I guess she had no choice in it -- she is locked into a contract, after all. Matthewedwards :  Chat 


  • Background and release:
    • The sentence "She noticed distinct similarities between "Halo", for which Tedder received co-writer and producer credits,[5] and confronted Tedder for using the same arrangement on two different songs" does not make it clear that the song to which Halo is allegedly similar is AG. It's implied, but I'd advise spelling it out.
    • ""fought and fought" with her bosses to prevent it from being released... She wanted "Cry" to be released as the album's third single"- the prose seems quite weak there, especially compared with the rest of the article. Not a GA issue but it's worth fixing and it might hold back an FAC.
    • "Later told MTV..."- is there a date (or just a month would do) for "later"?
  • Composition:
    • The Hartford Courant is italicised but not linked the first time it's mentioned, but it is linked further down. Link the first mention (mainly so people like me don't the "what the **** is the Hartford Courant?"). Linking it after that is personal choice I suppose as long as you don't overlink
    • "although he has done nothing wrong in their relationship, it was never meant to be and is destined for failure. She tells her partner that he could not have been any better, and therefore, to avoid hurting him in the future, he should move on, as she is already gone" reads like song lyrics. If that's what they are, they belong in quote marks ("").
  • Music video:
    • "The music video" should read something like "The music video for 'Already Gone'"
    • Who said ""lounging on chaises and lolling around ... while 'zazzed [sic] out in the sort of gowns and jewels we've yet to spot this girl-next-door pop star wearing in real life".[16]"? I realise it's referenced, but it can't hurt to name whomever you're quoting.
      • I'm finding it difficult to put this information in without messing up the structure of the sentence. Do you have any ideas?
    • "On July 22..."- I assume this in 2009, but the article ought to say so really
  • Live performances:
    • No real issues here. It must be said it reads rather like a "critical reception" section, but that may be unavoidable and, seeing as the reviews are of the performance, not the song, I don't think it's an issue.
      • I didn't want to just list a bunch of verrifiable places that she sung at; I think this provides more notability for the live performances. Matthewedwards :  Chat 
  • Critical reception
    • "About.com's Top 40 Pop called "Already Gone"" is weak. Is there a name for the reviewer so we can say "X of About.com..."?
    • Does the mention of the Daily Star really add anything? It may be slightly unfair of me but most of what's printed in that publication drivel and considering all the reviewer had to say of note was "it's way better than Halo", I'm not convinced there's any point having it there. Feel free to disagree on that though.
    • Consistency- ideally, when talking about reviewers and publications, go with "person of place" [my personal preference] (John Smith of A Newspaper said...) or "place's person" (A Newspaper''s John Smith) but try to avoid using both in the same article and certainly both in the same paragraph.
    • I have some issues with the prose in the last paragraph- "The song did receive some criticism...". Aside from an inanimate object "receiving" and arguments over whether one does "receive" negative criticism, I think you should just go straight in with a "However, X wrote Y" or "However, not all reviews were positive; X wrote that Y was Z"
  • Chart performance
    • "In North America, "Already Gone" entered the Billboard Hot 100 and Canadian Hot 100 charts at number 70 on 28 March 2009,[48] due to digital download sales of the album track, which was released two weeks earlier.[49]" is not very pleasant to read. I'd suggest:
...entered the Billboard Hot 100 and Canadian Hot 100 charts on 28 March 2009 (verb) at number 70... but you need to clarify what was due to digital download sales because it doesn't seem to make sense like that.

I've yet to check references- a cursory look at the list and at the cite temps suggests nothing alarming and I doubt there's anything there to stop a GAN. However, minor point for a future FAC- "work" and "publisher" in cite templates- for example, the Daily Mirror ref I mentioned above doesn't specify a publisher (Express Newspapers Ltd for the record). Have fun! Do feel free to drop me a line if you want anything clarified or I can do anything else useful. I'm watching this page and the article so I'll check up on improvements from time to time. HJMitchell You rang? 20:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Let me know if there's anything new with regards to the new edits. Best, Matthewedwards :  Chat  03:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charts sales and certifications

[edit]

I think this section should be in this format. TbhotchTalk C. 21:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be is all I can say. It got changed, changed back, and changed again. What can ya do? Matthewedwards :  Chat  23:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back Then

[edit]

I once thought this song was preformed by Alicia Keys. I guess I got confused there.--71.235.92.16 (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Already_Gone_(Kelly_Clarkson_song)&oldid=1204754701"