Talk:Alpheratz

Alpheratz has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

On 9 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Alpha Andromedae to Alpheratz. The result of the discussion was moved.

Naming Convention

Please add your comment at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions#Stars. Thanks AndrewRT - Talk 23:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

These anomalies are believed to be the result of separation of elements due to the inward pull of the star's gravity and due to the radfiation pressure, and their diferent effects on the elements. See Frech Wikipedia: "En arabe, Alphératz dérive d'une expression signifiant l'épaule du cheval. Elle est également connue sous le nom de Sirrah ou Sirah, d'après l'arabe Al Surrat al Faras, le nombril du cheval." Coronellian 00:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar Weather

Weather discovered on this star: clouds of mercury.

[1]

T@nn 08:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Talk:Alpha Andromedae/GA1[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alpha Andromedae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761587658/Alpheratz.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016030826/http://www.astrodwarf.com/star/detail/5315 to http://www.astrodwarf.com/star/detail/5315

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Alpha Andromedae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alpha Andromedae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5kwDneH5Y?url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761587658/Alpheratz.html to http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761587658/Alpheratz.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Double or triple?

Second paragraph has this: it is actually a binary system composed of two stars in close orbit
Somehow, the article has been put in category "Triple stars", and there is no mention of that elsewhere in the text. 91.154.188.185 (talk) 02:53, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article describes a third star. However, it is thought to be an unrelated more distant object. There are at least two other very faint close companions (discovered 2011), not described in the article and also thought to be background objects. Lithopsian (talk) 11:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, it is categorised as a triple star because the article has something about an unrelated object? 91.154.188.185 (talk) 02:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Short description: this star is a spectroscopic binary with a "visual companion", a star that it's not gravitationally bound to the former two, but appear nearby just because it's on the same line of sight. To me, the correct classification should be double instead of triple.Psyluke (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 November 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition, and consensus generally supports the idea that the proper name is more common than the Bayer designation. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 ^(talk) 15:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Andromedae → Alpheratz – When I searched about it, I got a lot of answers that prefers "Alpheratz" over Alpha Andromedae, which leads to that Alpheratz is more common. Plus, provisional names are usually preferred over a Bayer designation. 117daveawesome (talk) 07:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, more common. Flakkersweeee (talk) 12:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. Killuminator (talk) 13:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, redirect was tagged with R with possibilities. Nerdoyooo (talk) 13:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not, and if it was that would be wrong and not a reason to move the page. {{R with possibilities}} means a redirect could be made into its own article. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Stars do not have "provisional names"; minor planets do, and they're very different from proper names. Preferring proper names over Bayer designations has never been a convention on Wikipedia; proper names for stars are only preferred when they're more commonly used than Bayer (or other) designations. See WP:STARNAMES. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Astonished: two essentially-new editors turn up just to comment on this proposal within a few hours, one of them created four days ago presumably just to be able to vote on this proposal. WP:CANVASSING at best. Lithopsian (talk) 17:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. JeBonSer ^{(talk | sign)} 11:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.