User talk:Psyluke
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Psyluke! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 15:05, Thursday, September 20, 2018 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, Psyluke! Thank you for your contributions. I am B.N. Dehigaspage and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! B. N .D | TALK 15:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:3XMM J004232.1+411314, from its old location at User:Psyluke/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 3XMM J004232.1+411314 has been accepted
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of V Andromedae
[edit]Hello Psyluke,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged V Andromedae for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Lithopsian (talk) 18:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Lithopsian: I didn't know the article has been already deleted. I won't contest this decision. But I just have one simple question: how can I avoid the same mistake in the future? Psyluke (talk) 19:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Depending how you create the article, you may be warned that you are recreating a previously-deleted title. Otherwise you should be warned when you go to create the talk page. Try going to Talk:V Andromedae and seeing what happens. That isn't an outright ban on recreating the page (unless it was salted), but it is a strong hint. At the very least you would then go and read the discussion to make sure you address concerns when recreating. In general, for stars, the templates (eg. Template:Stars of Andromeda) are a good guide to which stars are likely to be notable, and anything not there would usually need significant recent coverage to become notable. Of course, WP:NASTCRIT has four simple checks to see if an astronomical object is notable. Lithopsian (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Psyluke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable stars
[edit]I had a look at several stars that you recently tagged as potentially not notable. A couple of them I found just enough info to maybe keep them. The others should probably be proposed for deletion. Just tagging them isn't likely to go anywhere. You could even put them all in one proposal - don't know if that will make things easier or end up in a convoluted discussion. Hard to imagine anyone is emotionally invested in those particular stars though, which is usually the sticking point. Lithopsian (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Lithopsian: I didn't want to be too hasty, but if you think they should be deleted, I can start a proposal. Just tell me which I should spare, so you can add the additional info you found. Psyluke (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- I've de-tagged and updated any that I think are worth saving. So if it is still tagged then it should probably be deleted. If not then I'm sure it will come out in discussion. Lithopsian (talk) 15:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Psyluke: I have removed the prod tags you placed on RU Andromedae, RY Andromedae, and ST Andromedae because they have previously been discussed at WP:AFD and therefore can't be deleted via prod. I only did this for procedural reasons and would not object to you nominating these articles at AfD again. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- That might be my fault. I did say "proposed for deletion", although I was thinking about AfD. On the talk page for an article, you can (usually) see if it has been through a previous PROD or AfD. PROD is for (assumed) uncontroversial deletions. AfD is a week-long, at least, discussion. Can't use PROD if AfD has been tried, clearly not uncontroversial. Could still be worth trying AfD again, the arguments to keep previously were fairly weak and IMO wrong, but were not opposed. Lithopsian (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Kuyabribri: Sorry, I could avoid this error if I read better the PROD page. I will submit later the three articles to the AFD page. Psyluke (talk) 12:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Psyluke: I have removed the prod tags you placed on RU Andromedae, RY Andromedae, and ST Andromedae because they have previously been discussed at WP:AFD and therefore can't be deleted via prod. I only did this for procedural reasons and would not object to you nominating these articles at AfD again. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- I've de-tagged and updated any that I think are worth saving. So if it is still tagged then it should probably be deleted. If not then I'm sure it will come out in discussion. Lithopsian (talk) 15:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)