Talk:Allograft

Cleanup

Cleanup tag moved to article page* Washburnmav (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The theme of this article is grafts in general, not allografts. It probably needs to be moved and/or merged with other articles. --Una Smith (talk) 05:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, but most clinical transplantations are allografts. Unless you have a few monozygotic twins handy. Andykinosis (talk) 04:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auto/isograft success

The article is a bit off in how it explains auto- and isografts. Isografts can still be rejected even if the donor and recipient have the exact same genome. Due to peptides bound to graft MHC. But, as it's not the article's primary focus, i'm not sure whether I should change this. A quandry for the older and wiser and less lazy. Andykinosis (talk) 05:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fetal allografts

Those allografts that happen all the time during pregnancy, i.e. the whole conceptus, isn't rejected. Why? --Ayacop (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need for this separate when there's Allotransplantation

This article deal with exactly the same subject as Allotransplantation. Everything could be put in Allotransplantation to be consistent with e.g. Autotransplantation and Xenotransplantation. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Allograft/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Changed rating to "high" based on medical/general importance of the term. - tameeria 21:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)