Talk:Allan Blakeney

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Canada: Saskatchewan / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Inappropriate/misinterpreted citations box

Hello, I added the inappropriate or misinterpreted citations box, as the article makes claims or cites facts that are not included in the article it uses as a source. As well, some claims are made without citation. McMuff (talk) 03:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you specify which claims are improperly sourced and/or unsourced? Dirac66 (talk) 03:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are the claims dubious? If not it is not a serious problem. Policy calls for citations for material that is likely to be challenged or otherwise doubtful. That's not the same as no problem at all but rather a problem best solved by ADDING to the article instead of deleting parts of it or just objecting to the article. If a cited source says he died from a heart attack and the article says he died from liver cancer, then, yes, the material must obviously be pared down to no more than what the cited source says. But if a cited source says he died from cancer and the article says he died from liver cancer, the detail is likely accurate and simply from another source. If one truly doubts that he died from liver cancer, the responsible thing to do is to make at least a cursory search for a possible source before deleting.--Brian Dell (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not what McMuff was referring to. The article history shows that s/he requested citations for three items in the description of Blakeney's economic policy as premier. The revision of the cause of death was made by Gaussgauss. Dirac66 (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Allan Blakeney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second worst defeat?

The article says that Blakeney's defeat in 1982 was the second worst defeat in the province's history. I'm not sure that's accurate. The worst was the Anderson government, in 1934, which lost every seat it had. Then there's Douglas's defeat of Patterson in 1944. Patterson lost 33 seats, and was left with a five member caucus. Blakeney in 1982 lost 35 of 44 seats; so he lost more seats than Patterson, but was left with a larger caucus in Opposition than Patterson (nine rather than five). I'm inclined to say that Patterson's defeat was worse, because he was left with only five members in Opposition. Thoughts? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 06:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]