Jump to content

Talk:All the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAll the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Fair use rationale for Image:LOST111.jpg

[edit]

Image:LOST111.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode name

[edit]

Is the name of this episode a reference to the Pete Townshend album "all the best cowboys have Chinese eyes"?Jesushouston (talk) 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:All the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 20:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to the review this weekend. Ruby 2010/2013 20:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • ...eleventh episode of the first season of Lost. -> eleventh episode of the first season of ABC television series Lost
  • Wikilink passenger manifest in lead and plot
  • The flashbacks were inspired by the writer's background as the son of a doctor,... I assume "the writer" is referring to Javier Grillo-Marxuach? Perhaps change and use his last name?
  • With Jack and Kate's journey, in the original outline they were to come under a dart attack by the Others, the island's native inhabitants, however it was cut because executive producer Damon Lindelof deemed the attack too "cheezy." A bit of a long sentence there. Also wanted to confirm if "cheezy" was what Lindelof meant. Ruby 2010/2013 05:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three reviews is a little low. Are there one or two more you could add in here?

Good mix of online sources and the DVD special features. There isn't too much else the article needs, so I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Nice work on a good episode of Lost, Ruby 2010/2013 05:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, I believe I have addressed the issues. -- Matthew RD 01:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Happy to pass this one. Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 01:45, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:All_the_Best_Cowboys_Have_Daddy_Issues&oldid=1198432353"