This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
A fact from All Glory, Laud and Honour appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I don't think to have the text in the article, - there are links. If kept, it should be explained that the English is not a translation, but rather an adaption. There is no "sweet" in the Latin, it's a different time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"he hymn was originally made of thirty-nine verses however only the first twelve lines were sung since a ninth-century published manuscript attributed to St. Gall until Neale's translation." I'd fix this if I knew what was intended.--Wetman (talk) 15:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article Gloria, laus et honor, and I suggest that after DYK honors we merge the two or we keep them separate, but then most of this one - covering the Latin hymn, should go to the other, including the Catholic categories. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]