Talk:Alice B Readers Award

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I apologize for being slow to add the references and justification for why the Alice B group should be added. I am continuing to add the data, and next time I will be sure to add Notes and References FIRST! Please don't delete this. It is definitely something that should be in Wikipedia as it involves a couple dozen extremely notable authors. Thanks! Diane Dmthompson (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, I'm willing to buy that, personally. It's a bit presumptious on my part to assume none of the authors are notable. I'd just make sure to get up any outside references you can find to this group, personally. It'd also be good to remove first-person terms like "our", so you can alleviate the COI issue. I'll go ahead and blot out the template to give you a bit more time. If it's still got major problems later, I'll put it up for AfD so others can evaluate the situation. But I doubt that'll be necessary. Let me know if you need info or have questions! - Vianello (talk) 21:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am hoping that the page now meets Wikipedia standards, Vianello, and any chance of deletion will now be removed. Thanks for your help. Diane Dmthompson (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Wikipedia has standard styles and formats, Please read WP:MOS especiall on sub headings and lists. --Triwbe (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]