Talk:Alfred E. Clarke Mansion

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Done: An image was uploaded Oct 2015 by User:Atlasowa. Signed Hadron137 (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Created stubJpclem 19:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of tone issues

The tone of this article is not encyclopedic. There are many idioms such as:

colorful reputation
answering the call for gold
off the wall
chewed up by the system

These phrases should be made more factual and concise. Hadron137 (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://wearwoof.com/mansionstory.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ascidian | talk-to-me 01:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The entire section Alfred E. Clarke seems to be copied directly from an article filed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license (CC BY-NC-SA). This license is listed as not compatable with Wikipedia in the table License Compatibility with Wikipedia. I hesitate to remove the content, because I'm not entirely familiar with the standard protocol or copyright rules and CC definitions. For now I added the attribution tag This article incorporates text available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license., but this isn't entirely correct. What's the best way to proceed? Hadron137 (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually the entire article was copy-pasted from several sources, so I've stubified it. CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 is not compatible with Wikipedia. –dlthewave ☎ 21:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]