Talk:Alexander V. Khramov

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 February 2023 by reviewer Onel5969 (talk · contribs).

Notably question

@Hemiauchenia: thank you for the notability tag. It's a good question. I've noticed other articles about figures with fewer interviews and book reviews than Khramov has, but I'll look into the criteria more closely and be glad for whatever decision is made. I should be more aware of what the notability criteria involve. Jjhake (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROF and WP:NAUTHOR are two different notability guidelines. It's possible that he fails the former but passes the latter, in which case he would be notable. I haven't analysed the latter case in detail. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, clearly not WP:PROF but possibly WP:NAUTHOR. There are several articles about each of his first two books, Катехизис национал-демократа (2011) and Обезьяна и Адам (2019), which are on two very different topics. With language limitations, especially, I'm not really equipped to evaluate the material very well, but I'm curious and will keep looking into it a little as long as it's an open question. If anyone is better equipped and better informed, I'm glad to defer. Jjhake (talk) 02:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia: would you please review the notability tag again that you placed on this article as I have since done more work with some sources related to a couple different areas of work by Khramov? Feedback appreciated regarding remaining questions. Jjhake (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it seems that the article should meet general notability criteria as it has been moved into draft and then reviewed by a member WikiProject Articles for creation (after some improvements). I'll remove that notability cleanup tag, but please update here if questions remain and it should go back in place (or have some other more specific cleanup tag in place). Jjhake (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

verifiability and general notability

For some more notes on the reason why this article was moved to draft (verifiability and general notability), please see here. Jjhake (talk) 23:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]