Jump to content

Talk:Aldergrove Flying Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Record flights?

[edit]

Wasn't there a record-breaking transatlantic flight by an English Electric Canberra that took off from RAF Aldergrove? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starviking (talkcontribs) 09:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

[edit]

Need to decide whether this is an article on RAF Aldergrove, JHCFS Aldergrove, or both. At present it mixes titles, content and tenses. CS46 20:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Aldergrove, as this is simpler, still by far the more WP:COMMONNAME and was the name for most of its history. Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station Aldergrove will only ever be a section within a broader overall article, so the name should stay with a more relevant name to the overall article. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Today the base is an AAC base. RAF Aldergrove is a defunct RAF base previously occupying the site. I think it's unhelpful and misleading for readers looking for the current base to be directed to that title. Maybe a split would be helpful? Rob984 (talk) 11:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:COMMONNAME, no-one is looking for "Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station Aldergrove" and the name still in use by everyone, pilots included, is either simply Aldergrove or RAF Aldergrove if they're not service. No-one, barring some bureaucrats, refers to it as a "Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station". Nor is its recent history under that name particularly notable.
Updating articles to track current names is one thing, but not when the new name is abstruse and ignored by those referring to the place. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COMMONNAME states "inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources". A google search for "JHCFS Aldergrove" returns 52,900 result. "RAF Aldergrove" returns only 18,900. The Royal Air Force refers to the station as "JHFS Aldergrove". Sources use "RAF Aldergrove" to refer to the now closed RAF station, not the current Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station. Like I said, if RAF Aldergrove has notability as a individual topic, maybe it warrants it's own article? I think it makes little sense to title an article about an AAC station with the name of a now closed RAF station previously occupying the site. Rob984 (talk) 19:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station Aldergrove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station Aldergrove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]