Talk:Alberta clipper

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Canada Start‑class Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not just the United States

For you Americans there, Alberta Clippers usually hit Ontario, Quebec, and some parts of Alatanic Canada, not just the United States.--199.212.250.96 13:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Other types of clippers

I heard in addition to Alberta Clippers (which are the most famous), there are also Saskatchewan Screamers and Manitoba Maulers, both of which are less common. I read that for these 3 types of clippers, here was the information for each of them:

Alberta Clippers- weakest of the three, most common of all (60%)

Saskatchewan Screamer- moderate intensity, moderate frequency (25%)

Manitoba Mauler- strongest of the three, rarest one (15%)

From what I've read, these would be 3 types of Clippers- systems which come in quick and drop a lot of snow (usually 2"-8") in a short time.

Beyond this, I know nothing more about the less common types of clippers. Maybe someone more informed on the matter can illuminate this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.67.202.120 (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accumulations are less?

I don't think, as the article says, that the following statement is accurate: "Alberta clippers also tend to bring snow with them, although since the temperatures are lower the snowflakes are smaller and therefore accumulations are less."

Lower temperatures enable more complete crystallization of condensed water vapor, therefore what ya get is MORE accumulation with the same amount of moisture than ya get at a higher temperature. This means that, though the flakes may be smaller, the accumulation is actually greater at lower temperatures. At 5 degrees F, 1 inch of water can equal as much as 60 inches of snow (according to Tom Skilling, WGN Channel 9 in Chicago) where as 1 inch of water at 32 F may only equal 7 inches to a foot of snow.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.205.130 (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colder air can hold less moisture. The colder the temperature, the less snow you get. This is standard: all huge storms occur at or near the freezing point. Always. --NellieBly (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes Made

I edited this page to better reflect what actually occurs with these systems. Yes, snowfall amounts tend to be less due to a lack of moisture, NOT the cold temperatures. As you said, the colder temperatures can actually lead to higher snowfall amounts. One of my meteorology profs back in college said he once measured two inches of snow that melted to a trace amount (<0.01"). Yeah, it was cold. -Paul 148.126.101.41 12:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polar high?

The article says it "gets caught up in the flow around the mass of high pressure which always inhabits cold polar areas". I'm not an expert in meteorology, but from my limited research it would appear that the Alberta clipper gets moved by the jet stream, and not the polar high. --sciencewatcher (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Popular Culture

So what? Trivial, irrelevant, pointless. Get my drift? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.113.61.66 (talk) 03:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chinook

This phenomenon is defined in terms of a chinook, with a hyperlink to a wikipedia article that is a disaster and explains nothing. Very poor article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.122.14 (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alberta clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alberta clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230050400/http://severewx.atmos.uiuc.edu/index.09.clippers.html to http://severewx.atmos.uiuc.edu/index.09.clippers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

effect on people

I couldn't find any articles about this on Google but I have anecdotal evidence to offer that when an Alberta Clipper does make it to the east coast of the US, I generally have aura if not a full blown migraine. Other cold fronts produces mild headaches but the Clipper is the dangerous one for me. 100.15.127.199 (talk) 13:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]